Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  12 / 24 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 12 / 24 Next Page
Page Background

Consumer safety is most compromised when laws fail

to track, limit and control salvage vehicles re-entering

the roadways and titles from being closed

. This short-

fall for consumer safety, state revenue, environmental

protection and a level playing field in business is ad-

dressed in detail in the newly released COMPREHEN-

SIVE VEHICLE BRANDING AND TOTAL LOSS BEST

PRACTICES GUIDE prepared by the National Salvage

Vehicle Reporting Program and authored by Howard

Nusbaum, an industry expert. The GUIDE was re-

leased on August 24, 2014; copies may be obtained by

contacting the NSVRP at

Administrator@NSVRP.org .

Recently the Iowa Auto Recyclers Board of Directors

reviewed and prioritized the recommendations or Best

Management Practices (BMPs) in the GUIDE. The

GUIDE is a thorough study of the industry regulations

pertaining to automotive salvage. It is the “NSVRP

standard for states to consider to improve the integrity

and standardization of the title branding and to better

protect the public, with special emphasis on lessons

learned from the Hurricane Sandy, Colorado flooding

and other investigations of title fraud, inaccurate title

branding and other abuses.”

GUIDE

“The following is a summary of NSVRP-recommended

best practices guidelines, which are in our opinion fully

consistent with the American Association of Motor Ve-

hicle Administrators (AAMVA) best practice standards

on salvage, rebuilt and reconstructed vehicles, to help

ensure that damaged and total-loss vehicles are prop-

erly branded and to help close loopholes that are often

used to bypass the initial branding of damaged vehi-

cles and to reduce title washing of vehicles with

branded titles.”

GUIDE

1) All states should recognize at a minimum two

classes of salvage titles: one that allows for repair/

rebuilding and a second that is non-repairable (also

known as junk/parts only/certificate of destruction).

A) The triggers for each classification should be

reasonable and well-defined, based upon either a

cost of repair as percentage of ACV, or a specific

level of damage.

Iowa has both a Salvage Title and

a Junking Certificate designation.

2) There should be very few (if any) exceptions to

when a total-loss vehicle is required to have a sal-

vage brand. Depending upon the level of severity

that brand may be either a repairable or non-

repairable brand. A total-loss payout occurs be-

cause the insurer has determined that it is not eco-

nomical to repair the car and should be deemed as

proof that there was enough damage that a brand

is appropriate to alert a future buyer to prior dam-

age.

Iowa restricts Salvage Title Transfers to DOT

Licensed Auto Recyclers.

3) States should not have exemptions to branding

and unintended loopholes should be tightly policed

and eliminated. Common exemptions and loop-

holes include: A) Cutoff years beyond which vehi-

cles get exemptions from branding; B) Value under

which vehicles get exemptions from branding; C)

High fixed dollar amount of damage under which

vehicles get exemptions from branding; D) Exemp-

tion from included classes of parts (such as air-

bags) or classes of repair work (such as painting)

in calculating the costs of repairs; E) Linking the

calculation of non-repairable salvage to the eco-

nomic return from the sale of the salvage vehicle.

4) States should ensure that insurers and other own-

ers are not given the latitude to declare unwar-

ranted self-exemptions when making branding de-

terminations. Subjective branding definitions, lack

of thresholds, including branding determination lan-

guage such as, “as determined by the person who

owns the vehicle at the time of occurrence or by

the insurer or other person acting on behalf of the

owner,” or allowing damaged vehicles with missing

or incomplete estimates to be classified as any-

thing but non-repairable salvage all serve to leave

branding determination in the hands of insurers

and other owners, who have an economic incentive

not to brand, or to under brand, damaged vehicles.

5) States should include a flood title brand designa-

tion and total-loss flood vehicles should be consid-

ered as strong candidates for non-repairable vehi-

cle branding.

Iowa has a flood designation on titles.

6) Bio/chemical-hazard vehicles should be considered

non-repairable unless specifically addressed under

the state’s inspection and re-registration process.

Recyclers News Press

Page 12

Auto Recycling Manifesto

Comprehensive Vehicle Branding and Total Loss

Best Practices Guide